Page 2 of 6
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:36 pm
by Nan Lanson
Set 1: 212647 + Endures All Things
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 3:10 am
by Iggy Timeeczech
Jeb, Waltzoftheflowers YES!!!!, and not even close for the total.
Nan, your total for the 4, is higher than the total of all 5 and no, not Endures All Things.
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:29 am
by Jeb Clampett
Let's try --
Pay Attention + 94747
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 3:11 pm
by Iggy Timeeczech
no and no, Jeb
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 4:22 pm
by Vesper Sparrow
Set 2 Phar and Free + 19397
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 5:07 pm
by Abe Froman
While this isn't really that constructive, I feel that 3 puzzles is more than enough, and 5 actually is deterring me from participating. That just makes an already tough game even more tough
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 6:20 pm
by Iggy Timeeczech
Jarrod, thanks for letting me know. Maybe it won't work out, but thought it would be fun to try.
Vesper, no and no
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:55 pm
by Jeb Clampett
Iggy -- totally agree that putting five in a set rather than three is an intriguing idea; and I encouraged it. But, since I'm actually participating as a contestant here -- and your puzzles are hard
, I've got to agree with Jarrod that 5 puzzles in a set is kind of intimidating -- and really hard.
Darn, I thought I was getting closer with my last try -- but obviously not.
You might consider the idea of breaking it down into more sets with fewer puzzles in each.
Or maybe allowing answers with more names. Like: Name + Name + (Name) + sum of ID Numbers?
Or not or whatever. Very cool puzzles, Iggy. Thanks for a set I can struggle with; it's a reality check to try to find answers and see how impressive the actual solvers are. I'm hoping that Set 4 will go on through Sunday and we can see Leo getting (rather than sending) ---- "No"
I'll be back with another guess tomorrow.
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 9:26 pm
by Corey Lange
set 1
157512
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 10:04 pm
by Chris Everett
Stab in the dark with set 4 - 288075
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:20 am
by Iggy Timeeczech
It looks like we are going to have to open it up. Thanks for the info Jeb! I guess I will start giving some help. I will start with higher and lower. I have to work today (gee, happy birthday to me) so I won't be around a ton to answer. But feel free to try guessing up to 2 individual horses and the total of the rest! We will see if that opens things up a bit.
Chris, that's the closest anyone's been with set 4, but no, too low.
Corey, you are also too low.
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 8:04 am
by Vesper Sparrow
Set 2 The Stranger II + 35165
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 8:57 am
by Skyla Tate
Set 1 98657 + Pure
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:28 pm
by Iggy Timeeczech
Vesper and Skyla, No and no to both of you and you are both too low!
Re: Beagle And Clampett Mixed Name Contest, via Iggy Timeecz
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:35 pm
by Jeb Clampett
Set 4:
Galileo, Most Admired, 126614